Eva Vedder vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Jun at 09:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Vedder vs A. Friedsam

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vedder 1 - 0 Friedsam
They have played 2 sets in total, with Eva Vedder winning 2 and Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 0. The last match between Eva Vedder and Anna-Lena Friedsam was at the W50 Palma del Rio, 27-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Eva Vedder getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Vedder | 1 |
Friedsam | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(QF) W50 Palma del Rio(06-27-25)
E. Vedder vs A. Friedsam H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$12,205 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,782 |
58.12% (254-183) | Career Total W/L | 60.18% (396-262) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
3 | Titles | 15 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
E. Vedder vs A. Friedsam Match Preview:
- On second serve performance in the last six months, Vedder leads slightly with a 42.63% point win rate compared to Friedsam's 40.51%.
- In recent return game stats, Friedsam has a marginal edge, winning 48.84% of points on opponents' second serves, while Vedder captures 47.15%.
- When returning first serves, both players are nearly identical with Friedsam at 30.74% and Vedder at 30.88%. Could this suggest close competition during points played off first serves?
- Regarding breaking point defense under pressure, Friedsam shows stronger resilience, saving 55.09% of breakpoints, opposed to Vedder's rate of 49.34%.
- The last year's match results reveal Friedsam's superior winning percentage at 72% compared to Vedder's 58.33%.
- Friedsam excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Vedder is strongest on hard courts, winning 59% of matches.
- Comparing recent match levels, Friedsam edges out with a 74.36% win rate in Challengers/ITF over $10K tournaments, while Vedder's win rate is 58.73%.
- Considering opponent quality, Friedsam typically faces stronger competition with opponent averages ranking at 291.42, unlike Vedder's average opponent rank of 324.69.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Friedsam boasts a significant advantage, having won 68% of such sets in the past year compared to Vedder's 45% success rate.
- In terms of breakpoint conversion, Vedder is more effective, converting 42.01% of opportunities versus Friedsam's 34.2%.
Editorial Prediction (June 27, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match displays a tight contest with varied strengths observed in both players. While Vedder demonstrates a slightly stronger second serve, Friedsam excels in returning and resisting breakpoints under pressure. This suggests potentially crucial moments in Vedder's service games.
Friedsam's recent overall match performance and success in deciding sets indicate a higher capacity to cope with pressure situations, possibly favoring her in tight scenarios. Moreover, Friedsam has faced marginally more competitive opponents over the past year, which could prepare her better for challenging matches.
Thus, considering the statistics and recent performance trends, Friedsam appears to have the edge to secure victory in the impending encounter.
Eva Vedder vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Vedder vs A. Friedsam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
1:16:49 | Average Match Time | 1:16:49 |
56% (27/48) | 1st Serve % | 63% (37/59) |
78% (21/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
71% (15/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (7/22) |
29% (4/14) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) |
49% (29/59) | Return Points Win % | 25% (12/48) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Vedder Recent Matches Played
A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

E. Vedder vs A. Friedsam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.12% (254/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.18% (396/262) |
57.49% (576/426) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.17% (890/640) |
53.38% (4921/4298) | Games Win/Loss | 53.56% (7611/6600) |
59.74% (92/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.08% (106/83) |
57.47% (150/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.66% (139/94) |
55.56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67.16% (135/66) |
50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.71% (16/19) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
1072 | Aces Total | 1548 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
1081 | Total Double Faults | 1677 |
1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:11:27 |
446.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 167.22 |
58% (15079/25890) | 1st Serve % | 65% (22175/34145) |
64% (9638/15046) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14469/22175) |
49% (5280/10866) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5510/11968) |
48% (1539/3193) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1692/3728) |
45% (12031/26448) | Return Points Win % | 43% (14424/33785) |
0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 36.84% (21/36) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (10/20) |
40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
57.14% (8/6) | Main Tour W/L | 52.88% (101/90) |
56.27% (148/115) | Challenger W/L | 68.30% (209/97) |
62.75% (96/57) | Futures W/L | 76.81% (53/16) |
58% (250/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (387/644) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
48% (45/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (90/174) |
46% (61/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (121/224) |
83% (270/225) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (390/334) |
16% (270/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (390/55) |
17% (167/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (268/61) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
